© Alex Harter

1 /12 /99

Basic Intent*

Male: to not have anymore wars.

    They went along with “free” countries not for the other rights, just the abandonment of ever increasing aggression.

    Historically, males have voted because males have fought (females paid taxes, too), not because of any reason related to productivity, but because men are easily duped into doing things for people who have power over them.  Men were slightly “show”-aggressive, but most of what attackers did was using the victims’ emotions against the victim, robbers mostly outthwarted quick capture by being quicker to leave, and men are not inherently aggressive enough to kill or seriously attack for no reason whatsoever, so with men, short-term profit by aggression is at best an intellectual pursuit; the most common kind of violence men actually at first from a reasonable fear, and followed by annoyance and frustration, then the attack.

    More inclined to sit in groups, and walk alone, the only men who can get away with violence are the few (about 10% or less) who can convince the others to shy away.

Female: to not have to live without physical comfort.

    They went along with the “long-term progress” idea because it promised endless emotional happiness, but when the short-term profit companies decreased emotional health, females said they had to have the vote or they wouldn’t let it keep going anymore.

    Historically, females have been more neglected than males, with their human traits of home work and efficiency.  Females do not naturally like to do other people’s dirty laundry, and have solider reasons for turning down work, one always being that they do more.  They really want to hold Love and Pity for themselves, zapping others occassionally to lauch at them, and in the short-term are more likely to be bitter and self-deceiving (unlike males, who just can’t get it), but are always happier in the long term because of such high expectations placed on them.  There are a few simple ways females can screw up (unlike males, who need only show aggression to evoke an exaggerated suppression response), though, and the first way is by being permanently hurt by anything someone does to them, requiring the Pity of others (of which females have themselves an abundant supply), and claiming to need permanent support and tears of others, because, let’s be honest, do you think anything that was ever done to a female has put her down?  Females have amazing powers of recuperation, and it’s not like females are going to become nuts with nearly the frequency that males do.

    Second, females can’t say, “I can’t do that because that’s something that men do”, because females do a lot of things that men are supposed to do.  Reliance on men is one of the most inefficient ways to do something (unless it’s irrational) if a female wants to get something done in a hurry.  Once emotionally uplifting activity becomes normal, men will be too busy to fight wars, so nothing’ll be destroyed anymore, and males will begin to enjoy the finer things, as females will have created things to enjoy.

    Third, females shouldn’t preted that they can’t kick the tiny butt of any male who attacks them, and taht being “assaulted” is their private primary fear.  This form of attack will only make a victim if the victim lets themselves be victimized.  Personal inhibitions against attacking the enemy should be dropped first, then females remember their arms that have done unending moving, carrying, thrusting, and parrying items and obstructing objects; their legs, which have wonderful function in moving, thrusting, and shock absorption; their often longer nails; their tiny, ballpeen-hammer like shoes; their smiling teeth, which let them bite off the nose of the attacker!  Females who show real aggression can scare off most males, and a broken nose or a “not guilty” of a female defendant are much more effective ways of attacking males than shouting “help”!

    Fourth, females shouldn’t let males be in control of sex, like “Pimps”.  They should find people who won’t be blown away by a “new” thing and who won’t blab and exaggerate about their “conquests”, because, as I have noted before, you can’t “conquer” women, at all; their constant disappearance and reappearance of bait makes every male jerk disappear eventually, unless the jerk can chain them down forever.  Males “win” females like the Egyptians were “allied” with the British!  To males, a pact with a jerk is literally like a treaty saying, “I will have to fight you for my freedom”, but obviously give themselves more freely.  Females tend to chain themselves with people they like, or are familiar with, rather than innumerable impersonal links to hateful strangers.

    Fifth, females shouldn’t define themselves in terms of males!  They can use the same language, and compare “trophy” males, but they can’t say they work “as well as” or “almost as well as” males.  Females are not weak, and they shouldn’t involve males in their rating system, not because the males are “better”, but because males that high are “lucky”!  Any male who isn’t a felon, killed by a gang, wacko, in a “blue-collar job”, or greedy, is lucky!  Females work a lot, efficiently.  Males are, when cut into their marrow, dumb.  Males are only physically “free element.”  Mentally, they stay on a tight path ringed by fear, and boredom, hoping silently that the inevitable shift to females knowing more will be put off, just a little more, so that they have time to feel as if at least they know something, even though they are as usual making something out of nothing (nothing is their experience).  Females tend to make something out of something, finding someone who already is helping themself and having them help others.  To summarize: males fantasize; females empathize.

    Sixth, females shouldn’t be concerned by the labels attached to them: “female” and “woman” May be longer than “male” or “man”, but “rock” is a designation, while “nice rock” is a description, as a semantic example.  The longer a name, the less the individual is stereotyped, as the categories on their own don’t fit.  Menstruation, “in heat”, sexy, and pregnancy, are terms not dangerous when females promise only things they can deliver.  They cannot really deliver love to a jerk, just like they can’t pet the caged eager animal at the zoo, because they are in separate worlds and shouldn’t risk an obviously disastrous exploration.  Females’ noon-sexual bodies complement their sexual parts, while males can be separated into their brains and the rest of them, there not being much of a distinction otherwise.  Females should be able to be thought of as intelligent, as well as sexy, and not be relegated to vocal obscurity in the disembodied male-dominated media and culture by the fear that few dumb females will loudly support more sexism.  There shouldn’t be an autonomous female community supporting and correcting all its members; females should be allowed to abandon some, or else “dumb blondes” and others will apparently be like the youngest children of the all-female family, getting more pardon than they deserve.  Not to say that feminists shouldn’t refrain from recruiting these few for their apparent neediness.

(* = I apologize for calling males dumb.  I apologize for letting females know that there is very little wrong with them.  I apologize for making females assertive, assertive for a good reason.  I apologize for suggesting females deserve more than males.  I apologize for making fun of males.  I apologize for the fact that I’m a (semi-sarcastic) male - Alex Harter {signed})